Measuring public acceptance with opinion mining: The case of the energy industry with long-term coal R&D investment projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37380/jisib.v8i2.319Keywords:
Carbon Capture and Storage, CCS, greenhouse gas control, market deployment, opinion mining, public acceptance, web-intelligenceAbstract
New Web 2.0-based technologies have emerged in the field of competitor/market
intelligence. This paper discusses the factors influencing long-term product development,
namely coal combustion long-term R&D/Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology, and
presents a new method application for studying it via opinion mining. The technology market
deployment has been challenged by public acceptance. The media images/opinions of coal power
and CCS are studied through the opinion mining approach with a global machine learning based
media analysis using M-Adaptive software. This is a big data-based learning machine media
sentiment analysis focusing on both editorial and social media, including both structured data
from payable sources and unstructured data from social media. If the public acceptance is
ignored, it can at its worst cause delayed or abandoned market deployment of long-term energy
production technologies, accompanied by techno-economic issues. The results are threefold:
firstly, it is suggested that this type of methodology can be applied to this type of research
problem. Secondly, from the case study, it is apparent that CCS is unknown also based on this
type of approach. Finally, poor media exposure may have influenced technology market
deployment in the case of CCS.
References
Abrahams, A. S., Jiao, J., Fan, W., Wang, G. A.,
and Zhang, Z. (2013). What's buzzing in the
blizzard of buzz? automotive component
isolation in social media postings. Decision
Support Systems, 55 (4): 871.
Åhman, M., Nikoleris, A., and Wyns, T. (2013).
Decarbonizing industry: emerging roadmaps
point to major need for financing radical
innovation. Carbon Management, 4 (1): 5-7.
Alphen, K., Voorst tot Voorst, Q., Hekkert, M.,
and Smits, R. (2007). Societal acceptance of
carbon capture and storage technologies.
Energy Policy, 35 (8): 4368–4380.
Ashworth, P., Boughen, N., Mayhew, M., and
Millar, F. (2009). An integrated roadmap of
communication activities around carbon
capture and storage in Australia and beyond.
Energy Procedia. 1 (1): 4749-4756.
Le Bars, Y., Murray, C., Ormai, P., Seppälä, T.,
and Bøhmer, N. Summary of the Panel
Discussion Concluding Session IV on Public
Involvement and Acceptance Panel IV: ‘Can
NIMBY be overcome?’
Bell, D., Gray, T., and Haggett, C. (2005). The
‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions:
Explanations and Policy Responses.
Environmental Politics, 14 (4): 460-477.
Berendsen, G., Middel, R., Pieters, I., Angard, F.,
and Hillerström, F. (2015). Social media
within sustainable product development: an
exploratory multiple case study on the
perception of social media usability in the new
product development process. Int. J.
Technology Intelligence and Planning, 10
(3/4): 273–293.
Bradbury, J., Ray, I., Peterson, T., Wade, S.,
Wong-Parodi, G., and Feldpausch, A. (2009).
The role of social factors in shaping public
perceptions of CCS: Results of multi-state
focus group interviews in the U.S. Energy
Procedia, 1 (1): 4665–4672.
Brouwer, A. S., van den Broek, M., Seebregts, A.,
and Faaij, A. (2015). Operational flexibility
and economics of power plants in future lowcarbon
power systems. Applied Energy, (156):
-128.
Bucchi, M. (2008). Of deficits, deviations and
dialogues: Theories of public communication
of science. Featured in: M. Bucchi and B.
Trench (Ed.) Handbook of public
communication of science and technology, New
York: Routledge International Handbooks, 57-
Budd, J.M. (2007). Information, analysis, and
ideology: A case study of science and the public
interest. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 58 (14):
-2371.
Budescu, D. V., Broomell, S., and Por, H.-H.
(2009). Improving Communication of
Uncertainty in the Reports of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Psychological Science 20 (3): 299-308.
Burnham, J., Debande, O., Jones, O., Mihai, C.,
Moore, J. and Temperton, I. (2013). Report on
Innovative Financial Instruments for the
Implementation of the SET Plan, First-of-akind
project. JRC Scientific and Policy
Reports, Ref: EUR 26058, OPOCE LD-NA-
-EN-N,
https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/default/files/ldna
enn_002.pdf, accessed 23 May 2017.
Burscher, B., Vliegenthart, R., and de Vreese, C.
(2015). Frames Beyond Words: Applying
Cluster and Sentiment Analysis to News
Coverage of the Nuclear Power Issue. Social
Science Computer Review, 1-16
Breukers, S. and Upham, P. (2015).
Organisational aspects of public engagement
in European energy infrastructure planning:
the case of early-stage CCS projects. Journal
of Environmental Planning & Management,
(2): 252-269.
Cambria, E., Schuller, B., Xia, Y., and Havasi, C.
(2013). New avenues in opinion mining and
sentiment analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems
(2): 15-21.
Carragee, K. M. and Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect
of power in recent framing research. Journal
of Communication, 54: 214–233.
Chen, H. (2010). Business and market
intelligence 2.0. IEEE Intelligent Systems
(1): 68-71.
Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., and Storey, V. C. (2012).
Business intelligence and analytics: From big
data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 1165-1188.
Dapeng, L. and Weiwei, W. (2009). Barriers and
incentives of CCS deployment in China:
Results from semi-structured interviews,
Energy Policy, 37 (6): 2421–2432.
de Best-Waldhober, M., Daamen, D, and Faaij, A.
(2009). Informed and uninformed public
opinions on CO2 capture and storage
technologies in the Netherlands, International
Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 3 (3): 322–
de Coninck, H., Stephens, J. C. , and Metz, B.
(2009). Global learning on carbon capture and
storage: A call for strong international
cooperation on CCS demonstration. Energy
Policy, 37 (6): 2161-2165.
Dessler, A. E. and Parson, E. A. (2006). The
Science and Politics of Global Climate Change:
A Guide to the Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
Dütschke, E. (2011). What drives local public
acceptance – comparing two cases from
Germany, Energy Procedia, 4: 6234–6240.
Du Toit, A. S. (2015). Competitive intelligence
research: An investigation of trends in the
literature. Journal of Intelligence Studies in
Business, 5(2).
Druckman, J. (2004). Priming the vote:
Campaign effects in a U.S. Senate Election.
Political Psychology 25 (4): 577-594.
Feldpausch-Parker, A., Burnham, M., Melnik,
M., Callaghan, M. L., and Selfa, T. (2015).
News Media Analysis of Carbon Capture and
Storage and Biomass: Perceptions and
Possibilities. Energies, 8 (4): 3058-3074.
Firestone, J. and Kempton, W. (2007). Public
opinion about large offshore wind power:
Underlying factors, Energy Policy, 35 (3):
–1598.
Fleishman, L. A., De Bruin, W. B., and Morgan,
M. G. (2010). Informed Public Preferences for
Electricity Portfolios with CCS and Other
Low-Carbon Technologies, Risk Analysis, 30
(9): 1399–1410.
Folke, C., Radgen, P., Rode, H., Irons, R., Schaaf,
H., Read, A., Möller, B. F., Schoenmakers, H.,
Imber, P., and Peter, K. (2011). E.ON’s current
CCS activities, Energy Procedia, 4: 6091-6098.
Fütterer, M. A., Carlsson, J., de Groot, S.,
Deffrennes, M., and Bredimas, A. (2014).
European energy policy and the potential
impact of HTR and nuclear cogeneration,
Nuclear Engineering and Design 27: 73–78.
Gerbner, G. and Gross, L. (1976). Living with the
television: The violence profile. Journal of
Communication 26 (2): 172-194.
Gielen, D., Podkanski, J., and Unander, F. (2004).
Prospects for CO2 capture and storage
Organization for Economic Co-operation and
Economic Development,
(OECD)/International Energy Agency (IEA),
Paris, France, p.252.
Godbole, N., Srinivasaiah, M., and Skiena, S.
(2007). Large-scale sentiment analysis for
news and blogs. ICWSM, 7 (21): 219-222.
Gough, C. (2008). State of the art in carbon
dioxide capture and storage in the UK: An
experts’ review. International Journal of
Greenhouse Gas Control 2 (1): 155–168.
Greenberg, M. and Truelove, H. B. (2011). Energy
choices and risk beliefs: Is it just global
warming and fear of a nuclear power plant
accident? Risk Analysis, 31 (5): 819-831.
Grove-White, R., Kearnes, M., Macnaghten, P.,
and Wynne, B. (2006). Nuclear futures:
Assessing public attitudes to new nuclear
power, Political Quarterly, 77 (2): 238–246.
Grubler, A. and Riahi, K. (2010). "Do
governments have the right mix in their
energy R&D portfolios?", Carbon
Management, 1 (1): 79-87.
Gupta, N., Fischer, A. R. H., and Frewer, L. J.
(2012). Socio-psychological determinants of
public acceptance of technologies: A review.
Public Understanding of Science 21 (7): 782-
Hammond, G. P., Akwe, S. S. O., and Williams, S.
(2011). Techno-economic appraisal of fossilfuelled
power generation systems with carbon
dioxide capture and storage. Energy. 36 (2):
-984.
Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Cilleruelo, E., and
Zamanillo, I. (2011). Public acceptance of
renewables and the media: An analysis of the
spanish PV solar experience. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15 (9): 4685-
Huijts, N. M. A., Midden, C. K. H., and Meijnders,
A. L. (2007). Social acceptance of carbon
dioxide storage, Energy Policy, 35 (5):
pp.2780–2789.
Huijts, N. M. A., Molin, E. J. E., and Steg, L.
(2012). Psychological factors influencing
sustainable energy technology acceptance: A
review-based comprehensive framework.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
(1) 525– 531.
IEA. (2010). Energy technology perspectives:
Scenarios & Strategies to 2050, International
Energy Agency, Paris,
https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublicati
ons/publication/etp2010.pdf accessed 23 May
Itaoka, K., Saito, A., and Akai, M. (2004). Public
acceptance of CO2-capture and storage
technology: a survey of public opinion to
explore influential factors, the Seventh
International Conference on Greenhouse Gas
Technologies, Vancouver, 5 September 2004.
Kim, Y., Kim, M., and Kim, W. (2013). Effect of
the Fukushima nuclear disaster on global
public acceptance of nuclear energy. Energy
Policy, 61: 822–828.
Kramer, G. J. and Haigh, M. (2009). No quick
switch to low-carbon energy. Nature, 462: 568-
Krause, R. M., Carley, S. R., Warren, D. C., Rupp,
J. A., and Graham, J. D. (2014). ‘Not in (or
Under) My Backyard’: Geographic Proximity
and Public Acceptance of Carbon Capture and
Storage Facilities. Risk Analysis, 34 (3): 529–
Lohwasser, R. and Madlener, R. (2012).
Economics of CCS for coal plants: Impact of
investment costs and efficiency on market
diffusion in Europe. Energy Economics, 34 (3):
–863.
Li, Y. and Li, T. (2013). Deriving market
intelligence from microblogs
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.01.023
Liu, B. and Zhang, L. (2012). A survey of opinion
mining and sentiment analysis. Mining text
data. Springer. 415-463.
Mathews, J. A., Kidney, S., Mallon, K., and
Hughes, M. (2010). Mobilizing private finance
to drive an energy industrial revolution.
Energy Policy, 38 (7): 3263-3265.
Maddali, V., Tularam, G. A., and Glynn, P.
(2015). Economic and Time-Sensitive Issues
Surrounding CCS: A Policy Analysis.
Environmental Science & Technology, 49 (15):
-8968.
Midttun, A. and Gautesen, K. (2007). Feed in or
certificates, competition or complementarity?
Combining a static efficiency and a dynamic
innovation perspective on the greening of the
energy industry, Energy Policy. 35 (3): 1419-
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., and Wood, D. J.
(1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder
identification and salience: Defining the
principle of who and what really
counts. Academy of Management Review 22
(4): 853-886.
McCorkindale, T., DiStaso, M. W., and Carroll, C.
(2013). The power of social media and its
influence on corporate reputation. The
Handbook of Communication and Corporate
Reputation, 497-512.
Matthes, J. and Kohring, M. (2008). The content
analysis of media frames: Toward improving
reliability and validity. Journal of
Communication, (58): 258–279.
M-Brain. Corporate communications. Received
/2015.
Miller, J. and Krosnick, J. (2000). News media
impact on the ingredients of presidential
evaluations: Politically knowledgeable
citizens are guided by a trusted source.
American Journal of Political Science, 44 (2):
-309.
Nasukawa, T. and Yi, J. (2003). Sentiment
analysis: Capturing favorability using natural
language processing. Proceedings of the 2nd
International Conference on Knowledge
Capture, 70-77.
Nuortimo, K. (2012). Essays on exploring
alternatives in CO2-neutral power generation
product development. Licentiate thesis.
University of Oulu.
Nuortimo, Kalle & Harkonen, Janne & Karvonen,
Erkki. (2017). Exploring the global media
image of solar power. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews. 81. 2806-2811.
1016/j.rser.2017.06.086.
Nuortimo, K., Härkönen, J., and Karvonen, E.
(2017b). Exploring the social acceptance of
biomass power, Interdisciplinary
Environmental Review, 18 (1): 14–27.
Oltraa, C., Salaa, R., Solàa, R., Di Massob, M.,
and Rowec, G. (2010). Lay perceptions of
carbon capture and storage technology.
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas
Control, 4 (4): 698–706.
Palmgren, C. R., Morgan, M. G., de Bruin, W. B.,
and Keith, D. W. (2004). Initial Public
Perceptions of Deep Geological and Oceanic
Disposal of Carbon Dioxide, Environmental
Science & Technology, 38 (24): 6441–6450.
Peñalver-Martinez, I., Garcia-Sanchez, F.,
Valencia-Garcia, R., Rodríguez-García, M. Á.,
Moreno, V., Fraga, A., and Sánchez-
Cervantes, J. L. (2014). Feature-based opinion
mining through ontologies. Expert Systems
with Applications, 41 (13): 5995-6008.
doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.022
Pietilä, V. (1997). Joukkoviestintätutkimuksen
valtateillä. Tampere: Vastapaino. In Finnish.
Rainer, D. (2008). A Looming Rhetorical Gap: A
Survey of Public Communications Activities
for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage
Technologies. Judge Business School,
University of Cambridge.
Reis, T., Barroso, A. C., and Imakuma, K. (2014).
Monitoring and analysis of nuclear acceptance
by information retrieval and opinion
extraction on the internet. Available from
Thiago Reis, retrieved on 21 June 2016.
Ruester, S., Schwenen, S., Finger, M., and
Glachant, J.-M. (2014).A post-2020 EU energy
technology policy: Revisiting the strategic
energy technology plan, Energy Policy, 66:
–217.
Santos, S. (2015). Oxy-CFB Combustion
Technology, Its potential role in CO2-
mitigation; O2GEN workshop, 18 June 2015,
Turku, Finland.
Scheufele, D. (1999). Framing as a Theory of
Media Effects. Journal of Communication, 49
(1): 103-122.
Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Domke, D., and Fan,
D. P. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue
regimes: Explaining Clinton’s public approval
in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly,
(66): 339–370.
Slotegraaf, R. J., Moorman, C., and Inman, J. J.
(2003).The Role of Firm Resources in Returns
to Market Deployment, Journal of Marketing
Research, 40 (3): 295-309.
Song, M. and Thieme, J. (2009). The role of
suppliers in market intelligence gathering for
radical and incremental innovation. Journal
of Product Innovation Management 26(1), 43-
Sovacool, B. and Ratan, P. L. (2012).
Conceptualizing the acceptance of wind and
solar electricity. Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews, 16 (7): 5268–5279.
Siegrist, M. (2000).The influence of trust and
perceptions of risks and benefits on the
acceptance of gene technology, Risk Analysis
(2): 195–203.
Siegrist, M., Cousin, M.-E., Kastenholz, H., and
Wiek, A. (2007a). Public acceptance of
nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The
influence of affect and trust, Appetite, 49 (2):
–466.
Siegrist, M., Keller, C., Kastenholz, H., Frey, S.,
and Wiek, A. (2007b). Laypeople's and
Experts' Perception of Nanotechnology
Hazards, Risk Analysis 27 (1): 59–69.
Slovic, P., Flynn, J., and Layman, M. (1991).
Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of
Nuclear Waste. Science 254: 1603–1608.
Stieglitz, S. and Linh D.-X. (2013). Emotions and
Information Diffusion in Social Media—
Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing
Behavior. Journal of Management
Information Systems 29 (4): 217-248
Teo, T. S. and Choo, W. Y. (2001). Assessing the
impact of using the internet for competitive
intelligence. Information & Management,
(1), 67-83.
Ter Mors, E., Weenig, M. W. H., Ellemers, N., and
Daamen, D. D. L. (2010). Effective
communication about complex environmental
issues: Perceived quality of information about
carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS)
depends on stakeholder collaboration. Journal
of Environmental Psychology, 30 (4): 347-357.
Terwel, B. W., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., and
Daamen, D. D .L. (2009). Competence-Based
and Integrity-Based Trust as Predictors of
Acceptance of Carbon Dioxide Capture and
Storage (CCS). Risk Analysis 29 (8), 1129–
Terwel, B. W., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., and
Daamen, D. D. L. (2011). Going beyond the
properties of CO2 capture and storage (CCS)
technology: How trust in stakeholders affects
public acceptance of CCS. International
Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5 (2): 181–
Tokushige, K., Akimoto, K., and Tomoda, T.
(2007). Public perceptions on the acceptance of
geological storage of carbon dioxide and
information influencing the acceptance,
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas
Control, 1 (1): 101–112.
Valkenburg, P. and Valkenburg, W. (2016).
Media Effects: Theory and Research.. 67: 315–
Wallquist, L., Visschers, V. H. M., and Siegrist,
M. (2009). Lay concepts on CCS deployment in
Switzerland based on qualitative interviews.
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas
Control, 3 (5): 652–657.
Wallquist, L., Visschers, V. H. M., and Siegrist,
M. (2010). Impact of Knowledge and
Misconceptions on Benefit and Risk
Perception of CCS. Environmental Science &
Technology, 44 (17): 6557–6562.
Wallquist, L., Seigo, S. L., Visschers, V. H., and
Siegrist, M. (2012). Public acceptance of CCS
system elements: A conjoint measurement.
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas
Control, (6): 77-83.
Wennersten, R., Sun, Q., and Li, H. (2015). The
future potential for Carbon Capture and
Storage in climate change mitigation – an
overview from perspectives of technology,
economy and risk. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 103 (15): 724-736.
Wolsink, M. (2000). Wind power and the NIMBYmyth:
Institutional capacity and the limited
significance of public support. Renewable
Energy 21 (1): 49-64.
Wolsink, M. (2007). Wind power implementation:
The nature of public attitudes: Equity and
fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
(6): 1188–1207.
Wood, E. (2001). Marketing information systems
in tourism and hospitality small- and mediumsized
enterprises: A study of internet use for
market intelligence. International Journal of
Tourism Research, 3(4): 283-299.
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., and Bürera, M. J.
(2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy
innovation: An introduction to the concept.
Energy Policy, 35 (5): 2683–2691.
Xu, K., Liao, S. S., Li, J., and Song, Y. (2011).
Mining comparative opinions from customer
reviews for competitive intelligence. Decision
Support Systems, 50(4): 743-754.
Zhang, Z. and Huising, D. (2017). Carbon dioxide
storage schemes: Technology, assessment and
deployment. Journal of Cleaner Production,
, Part 2: 1055–1064.
Zechendorf, B. (1994). What the Public Thinks
about Biotechnology. Bio/Technology, 12:
–875.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
